A Singapore survey reports fatigue, poor sleep and low perceived openness to menopause support at work. Read the findings and their limits.
On 2026-09-29, CNA reported findings from the Women Across Life Stages survey by Singapore’s People’s Action Party (PAP) Women’s Wing and NTUC Women and Family (NTUC WAF). Only one in 10 respondents said their workplace was open to discussing perimenopause or menopause support.
This announcement concerns workplace experience rather than a change to the medical standard of care. It asks whether women feel there is room to discuss support while they continue working. The question is different from deciding how an individual’s symptoms should be assessed or treated.
A policy-centred view of support asks what an employer provides. A conversation-centred view also asks whether someone feels able to raise a concern. The survey’s contribution is to bring that second question into view.
For women navigating midlife, managing an uncomfortable experience and deciding whether to mention it at work are separate tasks. Someone may want a discussion about working conditions without wanting colleagues involved in personal healthcare decisions. Recognising that distinction leaves room for both privacy and support.
It also changes how the findings should be read. The headline is about perceived openness to a conversation, rather than an inventory of employer benefits. That is a useful starting point for thinking about symptoms, boundaries and workplace support.
According to CNA, the online survey ran from August 3 to 31, 2026. It covered women at several stages of working life, including early career and periods involving family planning or caregiving. Its menopause-related findings came from respondents who said they were experiencing symptoms.
The reported results were:
The menopause-related findings concern the 288 symptomatic respondents. CNA’s available coverage does not provide enough information about recruitment, weighting, response rate or question wording to establish that they represent all working women in Singapore. It also leaves uncertainty about how the question concerning greatest impact was framed.
Perceived openness is not a count of formal policies or available accommodations. The result does not establish whether respondents had requested support or what an employer would have offered. Reported impact on work or well-being is also different from an objective measurement of job performance.
The survey does not establish the cause of each respondent’s fatigue or poor sleep and did not test treatments. The flexibility findings belong to other respondent groups. The sleep review discussed below is separate evidence and should not be blended with the Singapore results.
Fatigue and poor sleep are the most immediate health concerns in this part of the report. They deserve attention because women identified them as affecting work or well-being, not because the survey assigned a financial value to them. Well-being is a meaningful outcome in its own right.
There is broader health context for the sleep finding. A 2026 review indexed by PubMed Central estimates that sleep disruption and insomnia symptoms affect 40% to 60% of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. That places sleep within the wider discussion of the hormonal transition.
The practical response is to take the experience seriously without attaching a single explanation to it. A personal health conversation can address symptoms and their possible contributors. A workplace conversation can address what would help someone remain engaged in working life.
Those conversations need not compete with each other. Seeking support at work does not replace healthcare. Seeking healthcare does not make the work setting irrelevant.
For women reading the report, a difficult period of energy or sleep need not become a judgment about professional identity. The useful focus is the experience itself and the support question it raises. Capability and commitment should not be inferred from a survey statistic about symptoms.
The wider survey gives flexibility a clear place in discussions about working women’s needs. Its findings among mothers and adult caregivers show why the organisers were looking beyond one life stage. The menopause-related results sit within that broader account of work and well-being.
CNA reported that NTUC WAF director Yeo Wan Ling regarded flexible work as important. She also said women should feel able to use it without being viewed as less committed. Her comments bring a distinction into focus: having an arrangement available and feeling comfortable using it are different questions.
Yeo also said the role of family-care leave alongside flexible work should be studied. That keeps the discussion from narrowing to a single workplace measure. Different responsibilities and experiences can raise different support questions.
For a menopause-related conversation, flexibility is therefore a possible subject for discussion rather than a ready-made prescription. The practical issue is what a person needs to keep participating at work. That conversation belongs with the relevant workplace contact and the person affected.
A useful framing separates the health concern from the work request. One part concerns what someone is experiencing. The other concerns which aspect of working life needs attention and what support can be discussed.
This approach also leaves the woman involved with a voice in the process. A broad survey finding should not decide what she must disclose or which arrangement she must seek. The role of the evidence is to make a support conversation legitimate, not to write it on her behalf.
A separate report on the organisers’ priorities identified menopause literacy and destigmatization as areas where more support could be needed. Early-career mental well-being and workplace flexibility were also identified. The proposed direction covers several stages of women’s working lives.
CNA reported that PAP Women’s Wing planned to work with community partners on women’s health workshops. The partners would include the Obstetrical & Gynaecological Society of Singapore. Perimenopause and menopause were among the topics intended for the workshops.
That is an announced plan, not a completed programme or a demonstrated benefit. The next question for this local development is how the proposed education takes shape. Its practical value would need to be judged separately from the intention to provide it.
CNA also reported comments from Gan Siow Huang, adviser to the PAP Women’s Wing research group. She called for workplaces that are more flexible and responsive to women’s needs, saying women should not have to struggle in silence or compromise well-being to succeed at work. That is a stated direction for workplace support rather than a measured outcome of the survey.
For an individual reader, the next step is not to match herself to a percentage. It is to identify the question that needs attention. That might concern symptoms, the conditions of work or the ability to discuss support without making a wider personal disclosure.
Personal assessment of troubling fatigue or sleep problems belongs with a qualified healthcare professional. Workplace support belongs in a conversation about participation and working conditions. Keeping those roles clear helps avoid asking either conversation to do everything.
Questions about work also sit within a wider midlife picture that includes confidence and emotional wellbeing during the hormonal transition. Those are legitimate parts of health rather than side issues. They can remain in view without turning every concern into a hormone problem.
The strongest practical message from this report is straightforward: experiencing symptoms and feeling able to discuss support are separate matters. Both deserve a place in the conversation. Neither requires a woman’s working identity to be reduced to menopause.
Going forward, the survey supports including work and access to support in midlife clinical conversations, alongside an individual assessment of symptoms.
Putting these workplace findings into a wider understanding of midlife is the next step, and Refemina handles the evidence translation. Where messages about perimenopause, menopause and postmenopause conflict, its editorial coverage helps women separate credible findings from sweeping claims while keeping confidence and quality of life in view.
Follow Refemina for research-led insights on menopause, strength, metabolism, nutrition, skin, intimacy and confidence through midlife. New articles turn complex topics into clear, useful context.
Keep learning about the changes that shape energy, strength, confidence and wellbeing through midlife.
Explore Resources